Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754855AbbG1AmL (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2015 20:42:11 -0400 Received: from mail-lb0-f180.google.com ([209.85.217.180]:34193 "EHLO mail-lb0-f180.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754525AbbG1AmJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2015 20:42:09 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1438019319-19731-1-git-send-email-uros_bizjak1@t-2.net> <55B680D8.5070702@zytor.com> <55B696B2.3000702@kernel.org> <55B69CED.8050709@zytor.com> From: Andy Lutomirski Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 17:41:48 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ASM flags in general To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Uros Bizjak , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , X86 ML , Uros Bizjak , Ingo Molnar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 564 Lines: 13 On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 5:35 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > However... perhaps we can do the flags stuff first? There are certainly a ton of changes we ought to do. > Fine with me. Flags are probably more generally useful, especially because of the silly lack of output constraints on asm goto. --Andy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/