Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 09:15:19 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 09:15:19 -0500 Received: from smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.137]:40710 "EHLO smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 09:15:18 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 15:24:48 +0100 (CET) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@serv To: Werner Almesberger cc: Rusty Russell , , , , Subject: Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface In-Reply-To: <20030214105338.E2092@almesberger.net> Message-ID: References: <20030214120628.208112C464@lists.samba.org> <20030214105338.E2092@almesberger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 923 Lines: 23 Hi, On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Werner Almesberger wrote: > The module changes only make this a little worse, because they > follow the philosophy that this can't be fixed, so try_module_get > and friends try to implement the right kind of locking for unload > races (but for little else) without tripping over those "unfixable" > bugs. If you see these bugs as "unfixable", you already gave up and you end up putting one band-aid over another, each only solving part of the problem. Please try work with me here and we might find a more general solution. I could just post possible solutions, but as long nobody understands the problem, they will be rejected anyway. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/