Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755508AbbG1NdB (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2015 09:33:01 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]:32846 "EHLO mail-wi0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755211AbbG1Nc7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2015 09:32:59 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 15:32:55 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel Cc: Spencer Baugh , Toshi Kani , Andrew Morton , Fengguang Wu , Joern Engel , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Mel Gorman , Johannes Weiner , Shachar Raindel , Boaz Harrosh , Andy Lutomirski , Joonsoo Kim , Andrey Ryabinin , Roman Pen , Andrey Konovalov , Eric Dumazet , Dmitry Vyukov , Rob Jones , WANG Chao , open list , "open list:MEMORY MANAGEMENT" , Spencer Baugh Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: add resched points to remap_pmd_range/ioremap_pmd_range Message-ID: <20150728133254.GI24972@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1437688476-3399-3-git-send-email-sbaugh@catern.com> <20150724070420.GF4103@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20150724165627.GA3458@Sligo.logfs.org> <20150727070840.GB11317@dhcp22.suse.cz> <20150727151814.GR9641@Sligo.logfs.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20150727151814.GR9641@Sligo.logfs.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1356 Lines: 31 On Mon 27-07-15 08:18:14, J?rn Engel wrote: > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 09:08:42AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Fri 24-07-15 09:56:27, J?rn Engel wrote: > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 09:04:21AM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote: > > > > On Thu 23-07-15 14:54:33, Spencer Baugh wrote: > > > > > From: Joern Engel > > > > > > > > > > Mapping large memory spaces can be slow and prevent high-priority > > > > > realtime threads from preempting lower-priority threads for a long time. > > > > > > > > How can a lower priority task block the high priority one? Do you have > > > > preemption disabled? > > > > > > Yes. > > We have kernel preemption disabled. A lower-priority task in a system > call will block higher-priority tasks. This is an inherent problem of !PREEMPT, though. There are many loops which can take quite some time but we do not want to sprinkle cond_resched all over the kernel. On the other hand these io/remap resp. vunmap page table walks do not have any cond_resched points AFAICS so we can at least mimic zap_pmd_range which does cond_resched. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/