Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753156AbbG1SHO (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2015 14:07:14 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]:35310 "EHLO mail-wi0-f181.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752596AbbG1SHM (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2015 14:07:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 20:07:08 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Tejun Heo Cc: LKML , Oleg Nesterov , Christoph Lameter , Rik van Riel , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] kmod: Cleanups, simplifications, and make isolation friendly v3 Message-ID: <20150728180707.GB1547@lerouge> References: <1438014440-20669-1-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.com> <20150727184840.GB16393@mtj.duckdns.org> <20150727210530.GA19248@lerouge> <20150728180114.GJ5322@mtj.duckdns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150728180114.GJ5322@mtj.duckdns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 922 Lines: 28 On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 02:01:14PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Frederic. > > On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 11:05:41PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > IMHO, system_wq should be fine and if it isn't turning off numa > > > affinity or raising max worker limit later is pretty trivial. > > > > That's what I think too. How many workers system_unbound_wq can handle? If kmod > > 256 by default. Looks quite fine! > > > raises very high numbers of threads in parallel like > 500, I think that would be > > a problem on its own anyway. > > I'm having hard time to see how limit of 256 would be a problem. If > it becomes one, let's deal with it then. Agreed! Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/