Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751136AbbG1Vlb (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:41:31 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:35529 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750743AbbG1Vl3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2015 17:41:29 -0400 Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 14:41:26 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd To: Sylwester Nawrocki Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Sylwester Nawrocki , Tomasz Figa , Mike Turquette , Kukjin Kim , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Javier Martinez Canillas Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] clk: exynos4: Fix wrong clock for Exynos4x12 ADC Message-ID: <20150728214126.GA3159@codeaurora.org> References: <1434074005-18846-1-git-send-email-k.kozlowski@samsung.com> <20150721224235.GA30021@codeaurora.org> <55AED88D.2060009@samsung.com> <55B472C7.5000109@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55B472C7.5000109@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1640 Lines: 39 On 07/26, Sylwester Nawrocki wrote: > On 07/22/2015 08:41 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >On 22.07.2015 07:42, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >>>On 06/12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > [...] > >>>>>Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski > >>>>>Cc: > >>>>>Fixes: c63c57433003 ("ARM: dts: Add ADC's dt data to read raw data for exynos4x12") > >>>>>Link:https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/6/11/85 > >>> > >>>Did you want clk maintainers to apply this? The To: list is not > >>>helping so I'm not sure what's going on and it seems to have > >>>slipped through the cracks. > > > >Thank you for being proactive! I appreciate this. > >Some time ago Sylwester replied that he took care about this patch so I > >think this will go through Samsung clock tree. > > > >Sylwester, are you planning to send this as fix for 4.2-rc? > > I think it qualifies for 4.3, it's not a new regression and will be > backported to -stable anyway. > I would prefer clk maintainers have applied this, otherwise I would > need to make a (questionable) pull request with only one patch, since > all patches except this one after the last merge window were part > of bigger series touching multiple subsystems and applied through > the samsung soc tree. > Ok. Applied to clk-next. -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/