Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 14:59:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 14:59:44 -0500 Received: from smtpzilla5.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.141]:56840 "EHLO smtpzilla5.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 14:59:43 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 21:09:18 +0100 (CET) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@serv To: Werner Almesberger cc: Rusty Russell , , , , Subject: Re: [RFC] Migrating net/sched to new module interface In-Reply-To: <20030214153039.G2092@almesberger.net> Message-ID: References: <20030214120628.208112C464@lists.samba.org> <20030214105338.E2092@almesberger.net> <20030214153039.G2092@almesberger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 875 Lines: 23 Hi, On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Werner Almesberger wrote: > > Please try work with me here and we might find a more general solution. > > I could just post possible solutions, but as long nobody understands the > > problem, they will be rejected anyway. > > Step one is to fix those "unfixable" problems. That's independent > of modules, and I'm convinced that it needs to be done. Step one is still to understand the problem. I described a very real problem, once this problem is solved (which can be done in different ways), I can explain how this can be applied to modules. It's not really independent of modules. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/