Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 15:19:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 15:19:02 -0500 Received: from hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.202.12]:65516 "HELO hermes.fachschaften.tu-muenchen.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 15:19:01 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 21:28:48 +0100 From: Adrian Bunk To: Larry McVoy , Larry McVoy , Rik van Riel , Jamie Lokier , Andrea Arcangeli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: openbkweb-0.0 Message-ID: <20030214202847.GK20159@fs.tum.de> References: <20030206021029.GW19678@dualathlon.random> <20030213024751.GA14016@bjl1.jlokier.co.uk> <20030213161337.GA9654@work.bitmover.com> <20030213211127.GG20159@fs.tum.de> <20030213220522.GA11214@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030213220522.GA11214@work.bitmover.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2354 Lines: 58 On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 02:05:23PM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 10:11:27PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 08:13:37AM -0800, Larry McVoy wrote: > > >... > > > We'd view reverse engineering the protocol as falling under the "you're > > > working on a competing implementation". > > >... > > > > If a clause in a license forbids a licensee to use or decompile the > > program to gather the information needed for independendly developed > > programs to interoperate with this program current German copyright law > > says that this clause is void in Germany. :-) > > Please show me the case law which says we have to give you our technology, There is no case law in Germany. I'm talking about the text written in paragraph 69g (2) of the German "Gesetz ueber Urheberrecht und verwandte Schutzrechte (Urheberrechtsgesetz)". > for free, and we do not have the right to say "no way unless you agree to > not reverse engineer". German copyright law says that any clauses that forbid reverse engineering for gathering data needed for independendly developed programs to interoperate with this program are void. Full stop. There's simply no legal possibility for you under current German copyright law to allow anyone to use your program without allowing him to reverse engineer your proprietary protocol. > Lots of law says "if you paid for this product, the seller may not impose > the following restrictions" with reverse engineering being amongst those. > > I do not have any data which says that the same law applies in the case of > a no charge copy of the software, do you? German copyright law talks about licensees, not about money. It doesn't matter whether the licence was free or whether it costs a billion Euro. If you don't believe me ask any lawyer who knows German copyright law. cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/