Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 18:05:56 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 18:05:56 -0500 Received: from pc2-cwma1-4-cust86.swan.cable.ntl.com ([213.105.254.86]:12417 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 18:05:56 -0500 Subject: Re: WBEM and WMI From: Alan Cox To: "Simoneaux, Jill" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Message-Id: <1045268160.1854.23.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.1 (1.2.1-4) Date: 15 Feb 2003 00:16:01 +0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 569 Lines: 12 On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 22:54, Simoneaux, Jill wrote: > Are there any plans for incorporating WBEM into the kernel?? Why would it need to be in the kernel ? We already handle things like DMI table scanning almost entirely in user space (we just touch it in kernel at boot to look for hardware signatures indicating problems) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/