Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755106AbbG3Jh0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2015 05:37:26 -0400 Received: from mail-la0-f50.google.com ([209.85.215.50]:33690 "EHLO mail-la0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750775AbbG3JhY (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2015 05:37:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1438196676-30255-1-git-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <55B97C88.6010004@linaro.org> <20150730105923-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:37:23 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] arm: change vendor ID for virtio-mmio From: G Gregory To: Peter Maydell Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Shannon Zhao , QEMU Developers , lkml - Kernel Mailing List , "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" , Shannon Zhao , Igor Mammedov , =?UTF-8?B?QWxleCBCZW5uw6ll?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 958 Lines: 23 On 30 July 2015 at 10:24, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 30 July 2015 at 09:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 09:23:20AM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote: >>> >>> Why do we drop the previous way using "QEMUXXXX"? Something I missed? >> >> So that guests that bind to this interface will work fine with non QEMU >> implementations of virtio-mmio. > > I don't understand this sentence. If there are pre-existing > non-QEMU virtio-mmio implementations, then they're using > LNRO0005, and we should use it too. The only one I have come across is the ARM FVP model, and it happens that I chose the ID and maintain the tables for that so I can change it. Graeme -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/