Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752915AbbG3OQQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:16:16 -0400 Received: from smtp.nue.novell.com ([195.135.221.5]:35520 "EHLO smtp.nue.novell.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751255AbbG3OQO (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:16:14 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 22:16:01 +0800 From: joeyli To: Matt Fleming Cc: Borislav Petkov , "H. Peter Anvin" , "Lee, Chun-Yi" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , x86@kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64/efi: Mapping Boot and Runtime EFI memory regions to different starting virtual address Message-ID: <20150730141601.GO15651@linux-rxt1.site> References: <55B9D806.7030705@zytor.com> <20150730080323.GD8984@nazgul.tnic> <20150730101131.GB2725@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20150730110959.GJ15651@linux-rxt1.site> <20150730111819.GK15651@linux-rxt1.site> <20150730120916.GD2725@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20150730123116.GL15651@linux-rxt1.site> <20150730131723.GG2725@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20150730133947.GN15651@linux-rxt1.site> <20150730140542.GI2725@codeblueprint.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150730140542.GI2725@codeblueprint.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1495 Lines: 36 On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 03:05:42PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jul, at 09:39:47PM, joeyli wrote: > > > > OK, understood! Thanks for your suggestion! > > > > But, I have a question about mapping Boot Code/Data to -4G area. I understand > > we need Runtime regions, and 1:1 mapping is the workaround of some buggy BIOS. > > But why should kernel mapping Boot regions to -4G area? > > We map the Boot Service regions in the -4G area for simplicity, i.e. > it's easier to iterate through the EFI memory map in order, and map > things starting at -4G and working down to lower addresses, than it > would be to make different mapping decisions based on the region type. > > As for why we map the Boot Service regions *at all*, that's also a bug > workaround, see commit 916f676f8dc0 ("x86, efi: Retain boot service code > until after switching to virtual mode"). We setup the mappings before we > call efi_free_boot_services(). > > -- > Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center Thanks for your explanation. For my issue, I will check if rewriting the VA of runtime services can fix issue. If not, then I think need find a way to sync the mapping in EFI page table between boot kernel and image kernel. Thanks a lot! Joey Lee -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/