Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 19:40:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 19:40:29 -0500 Received: from bjl1.jlokier.co.uk ([81.29.64.88]:4992 "EHLO bjl1.jlokier.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 19:40:28 -0500 Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 00:52:11 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier To: "Vlad@geekizoid.com" Cc: "'Alan Cox'" , "'Larry McVoy'" , "'Linux Kernel Mailing List'" Subject: Re: openbkweb-0.0 Message-ID: <20030215005211.GD4333@bjl1.jlokier.co.uk> References: <1045241763.1353.19.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <008501c2d486$cbf51d20$0200a8c0@wsl3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <008501c2d486$cbf51d20$0200a8c0@wsl3> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2406 Lines: 62 Vlad, I noticed a typographical error in your correction to Alan's message. You wrote "...software that is being offered to me for free...". I think you meant "...software that is being offered to me for free (as in beer)...". Thanks for your time. -- Jamie "pain in the arse" Lokier ;) Vlad@geekizoid.com wrote: > Hey Alan, > I noticed a typographical error in your message. I thought I'd help you > out with a correction: > > s/"All I want is to be able to review the 3c990 patch. Right now I > can't"/"All I want is to be able to review the 3c990 patch. Right now I > can't be bothered to use software that is being offered to me for free > because it's far more important to get into mindless flamewars over tools > that make life easier for everyone. Oh, and Stallman is god." > > Hope that helps. > > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org]On Behalf Of Alan Cox > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 10:56 AM > To: Larry McVoy > Cc: David Lang; Matthew D. Pitts; Linux Kernel Mailing List > Subject: Re: openbkweb-0.0 > > > On Fri, 2003-02-14 at 15:30, Larry McVoy wrote: > > Second of all, all of those reverse engineering clauses are dependent on > > you having a legal copy of the software, full stop. You can't get a > > legal copy if what you want to do, now or in the future, is to reverse > > engineer the software. > > Go talk to an EU lawyer. These laws exist to stop people locking down > formats and its one of the reasons you actually have things like > open office > > All I want is to be able to review the 3c990 patch. Right now I can't > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/