Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 14:13:02 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 14:12:52 -0500 Received: from et-gw.etinc.com ([207.252.1.2]:13 "EHLO etinc.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 14:12:50 -0500 Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20010217142352.0390aad0@mail.etinc.com> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 14:24:42 -0500 To: Dan Hollis From: Dennis Subject: Re: Linux stifles innovation... Cc: , Andrew Scott , Andrew Scott , In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.0.20010216170349.01efc030@mail.etinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At 05:31 PM 02/16/2001, Dan Hollis wrote: >On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Dennis wrote: > > The biggest thing that the linux community does to stifle innovation is to > > bash commercial vendors trying to make a profit by whining endlessly about > > "sourceless" distributions and recommending "open-source" solutions even > > when they are wholly inferior. You're only hurting yourselves in the long > > run. In that respect MS is correct, because those with the dollars to > > innovate will stay away. > >So I take it you support M$ on the legislation bit also... No. You conveniently snipped the part where I said that Microsoft is not one to talk. They "stifle the market" in other ways, like not completely documenting the OS for their own advantage. DB >-Dan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/