Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 20:48:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 20:48:55 -0500 Received: from bjl1.jlokier.co.uk ([81.29.64.88]:10880 "EHLO bjl1.jlokier.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 20:48:55 -0500 Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 02:00:44 +0000 From: Jamie Lokier To: "Vlad@geekizoid.com" Cc: "'Linux Kernel Mailing List'" , "'Alan Cox'" , "'Larry McVoy'" Subject: Re: openbkweb-0.0 Message-ID: <20030215020044.GG4333@bjl1.jlokier.co.uk> References: <1045273835.2961.0.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <008e01c2d48d$d0fe28f0$0200a8c0@wsl3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <008e01c2d48d$d0fe28f0$0200a8c0@wsl3> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1010 Lines: 23 Vlad@geekizoid.com wrote: > Seriously, it's not like you [Alan] can't work under the > circumstances - you just refuse to. That's your choice - one I respect. > Why try to, or even advocate limiting Larry's choices? That seems unfair > and blatantly hypocritical at best. :-( Fwiw, even though Larry's offered to special-case Alan, (and presumed that Alan's doesn't work for anyone other than Red Hat), in private email Larry made it clear _I_ am not allowed to use Bitkeeper. This is because I work on scripts which analyse repositories - and even though I was prepared to limit the scope of that work for a time. Now I am hardly the high-profile kernel hacker that Alan is. But that shouldn't matter, should it? Thanks for not using Word, Alan :) -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/