Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 22:02:08 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 22:02:08 -0500 Received: from fmr01.intel.com ([192.55.52.18]:52683 "EHLO hermes.fm.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 14 Feb 2003 22:02:07 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" To: "'Joel Becker'" , Alan Cox Cc: Rusty Lynch , Matt Porter , Scott Murray , Patrick Mochel , Dave Jones , lkml Subject: RE: [PATCH][RFC] Proposal for a new watchdog interface using sysf s Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2003 19:11:58 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 889 Lines: 24 > On Fri, Feb 14, 2003 at 05:55:53PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > think you need to care about that for now. Sysfs doesn't > help here in > > the general case as it lacks persistant file permissions, > but where it > > Oh, junk. I liked this proposal a lot, but lack of persistent > permissions kills it pretty dead. If by persistant you mean across reboots, you can do what devfs did; at shutdown, save the ones that change; at init, restore them -- some to sensible defaults, plus the saved changes. That's user space policy. Or am I missing anything? Inaky Perez-Gonzalez -- Not speaking for Intel - opinions are my own [or my fault] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/