Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751478AbbG3Xx3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2015 19:53:29 -0400 Received: from mail-qg0-f51.google.com ([209.85.192.51]:34542 "EHLO mail-qg0-f51.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750938AbbG3Xx1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jul 2015 19:53:27 -0400 Message-ID: <55BAB8F4.1060205@hurleysoftware.com> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 19:53:24 -0400 From: Peter Hurley User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Ogness CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tony Lindgren , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, nsekhar@ti.com, nm@ti.com, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] serial: 8250: unlock port for uart_write_wakeup() References: <87h9ol2r4y.fsf@linutronix.de> <55BAB00B.3010806@hurleysoftware.com> In-Reply-To: <55BAB00B.3010806@hurleysoftware.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1264 Lines: 34 On 07/30/2015 07:15 PM, Peter Hurley wrote: > On 07/30/2015 06:54 PM, John Ogness wrote: >> uart_write_wakeup() should be called without holding the port lock. >> Otherwise a possible recursive spinlock issue can occur, such as >> the following callchain: >> >> 8250_core.c:serial8250_tx_chars() - called with port locked >> serial_core.c:uart_write_wakeup() >> tty_io.c:tty_wakeup() >> st_core.c:st_tty_wakeup() >> st_core.c:st_tx_wakeup() >> st_core.c:st_int_write() >> serial_core.c:uart_write() - locks port > > NAK. > > This is a bug in the N_TI_WL line discipline, specifically in the > st_tx_wakeup() function, which cannot perform the write synchronously. > > This is a common line discipline bug, and typically fixed by performing > the wakeup operations from a kworker instead. Also, seriously consider if you want to use that TI line discipline at all. If you're using it only for bluetooth w/ kernel bluetooth stack, you don't need btwilink + st_drv anyway. Regards, Peter Hurley -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/