Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751013AbbGaFGM (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 01:06:12 -0400 Received: from mail-am1on0143.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.112.143]:43744 "EHLO emea01-am1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750787AbbGaFGL convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 01:06:11 -0400 From: "Karajgaonkar, Saurabh (S.)" To: Felipe Balbi CC: "srinivas.kandagatla@gmail.com" , "maxime.coquelin@st.com" , "patrice.chotard@st.com" , "stern@rowland.harvard.edu" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "mathias.nyman@intel.com" , "johan@kernel.org" , "sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com" , "Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr" , "khilman@linaro.org" , "rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com" , "pmladek@suse.cz" , "wsa@the-dreams.de" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "kernel@stlinux.com" , "linux-usb@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/usb/: Simplify return statements Thread-Topic: [PATCH] drivers/usb/: Simplify return statements Thread-Index: AQHQysmOq00IovG9kkWKmsToejPf4J30MxyAgADUfoA= Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 05:06:07 +0000 Message-ID: <20150731050558.GA2481@alcatraz> References: <20150730131337.GA2715@alcatraz> <20150730162527.GL18246@saruman.tx.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <20150730162527.GL18246@saruman.tx.rr.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: ti.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-originating-ip: [74.112.167.117] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;DBXPR06MB382;5:eNjtXSVYutNaWrr8W/MMS17RpyTdsB7H3iKbR3H1x4WUxVIxqC1aQI4X1TM6rIqGkRS/WAGvDSiAP0uwFKhAiaob0xZAFS0iF9DQy/zWFU01xqus+bRsxeA7CoMaqvFaKrJgHBglr15HMZ4uPqIOJg==;24:9w5BY3AxyK2QDkQG6xpOOAUrpYmHW3KDsUFeSoUPLg4LXZFXVRCS30kUO4dfWjECcA1VQ3345sack3C7bUqf0zkJFe2IHgkkXBg5eQ+jkpc=;20:NkLtO5O0b6dbkQ3aReU1F2bX2zGpWwnZMcHvhe8z14eCYCMbIPa+ixRmYTf1mBRdjwpXRGxq4EZt7ysSKqtb1w== x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DBXPR06MB382; dbxpr06mb382: X-MS-Exchange-Organization-RulesExecuted x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004)(5005006)(3002001);SRVR:DBXPR06MB382;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:DBXPR06MB382; x-forefront-prvs: 0654257CF5 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(51694002)(24454002)(189998001)(102836002)(77096005)(77156002)(110136002)(2950100001)(50986999)(40100003)(19580395003)(33716001)(5001920100001)(62966003)(86362001)(2656002)(76176999)(87936001)(33656002)(2900100001)(66066001)(106116001)(92566002)(122556002)(46102003)(5001960100002)(5002640100001)(54356999)(19580405001);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102;SCL:1;SRVR:DBXPR06MB382;H:DBXPR06MB382.eurprd06.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;MLV:sfv;LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <384CCEAC9D5EE14B8788645879F04796@eurprd06.prod.outlook.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: visteon.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 31 Jul 2015 05:06:07.2838 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 7a147aaf-01ec-498c-80a1-e34a8c63c548 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DBXPR06MB382 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1342 Lines: 35 Sure, I'll do that. Just wanted to know whether I should split the patches and send them in this same mail thread (may be something like [PATCH 01/04 V2]) or should I start new threads and send them separately to the respective maintainers. Thanks and Regards, Saurabh Karajgaonkar On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 11:25:27AM -0500, Felipe Balbi wrote: > On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 01:13:42PM +0000, Karajgaonkar, Saurabh (S.) wrote: > > From: Saurabh Karajgaonkar > > > > This patch is created using simple_return.cocci coccinelle script. > > It replaces the redundant instances where variables are assigned > > return value from functions and then used in return statements. > > > > Signed-off-by: Saurabh Karajgaonkar > > do you mind splitting this per-driver ? That makes it a lot easier for > different maintainers to take their part. For example, I would take > drivers/usb/phy/* and drivers/usb/musb/* > > Alan Stern would handle drivers/usb/host/[uoe]hci*.[ch] > > Mathias Nyman, driver/usb/host/xhci*.[ch] > > and so on. Thanks > > -- > balbi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/