Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S261427AbTBOLYp>; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 06:24:45 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S261456AbTBOLYp>; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 06:24:45 -0500
Received: from mail.hometree.net ([212.34.181.120]:50888 "EHLO
	mail.hometree.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S261427AbTBOLYo>; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 06:24:44 -0500
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Path: not-for-mail
From: "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <hps@intermeta.de>
Newsgroups: hometree.linux.kernel
Subject: Re: 3Com 3cr990 driver release
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 11:34:38 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH
Message-ID: <b2l8ke$v55$1@tangens.hometree.net>
References: <3E4C9FAA.FC8A2DC7@y12.doe.gov> <1045233209.7958.11.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20030214151920.GA3188@work.bitmover.com> <1045241640.1353.13.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20030214160915.GC3188@work.bitmover.com> <1045243414.1353.28.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> <20030214163611.GD3188@work.bitmover.com>
Reply-To: hps@intermeta.de
NNTP-Posting-Host: forge.intermeta.de
X-Trace: tangens.hometree.net 1045308878 31909 212.34.181.4 (15 Feb 2003 11:34:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@intermeta.de
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 11:34:38 +0000 (UTC)
X-Copyright: (C) 1996-2003 Henning Schmiedehausen
X-No-Archive: yes
User-Agent: nn/6.6.5
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1713
Lines: 34

Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com> writes:

>taking a half decade off to code up an SCM system good enough for
>Linus to use.  Without the benefit of having one to copy, by the way.

Using this statement over and over doesn't make it more true.

Linus stated in public that he was/is unhappy with CVS. Without
Bitkeeper he might use Subversion today. But by using Bitkeeper he
made it possible that you and your company started using him as your
posterboy for the "SCM good enough for Linus Torvalds to use". This is
IMHO not correct. BK is just "the first SCM which came along and was
good enough for Linus Torvalds to use it".

I do remember Linus saying that he wants to try out BitKeeper for the
2.5 development tree and if it does not work out, switch to something
else in the 2.6, 2.7... cycle.

The rift that the whole BitKeeper/BitMover stuff has opened in the
kernel developer community IMHO justifies such a step forward . I'd
like to see SVN to be used as an alternative tool. Not because it is
better (it probably is not, but I haven't had a chance to try out BK
because I don't qualify for the free license) than BK but because it
has no strings attached to its usage.

	Regards
		Henning

-- 
Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen          INTERMETA GmbH
hps@intermeta.de        +49 9131 50 654 0   http://www.intermeta.de/

Java, perl, Solaris, Linux, xSP Consulting, Web Services 
freelance consultant -- Jakarta Turbine Development  -- hero for hire
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/