Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 06:26:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 06:26:20 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.65.60]:25538 "HELO mail.gmx.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 06:26:19 -0500 Message-Id: <5.1.1.6.2.20030215123533.00cd3e70@pop.gmx.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1.1 Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 12:40:55 +0100 To: Rik van Riel From: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [PATCH] CFQ scheduler, #2 Cc: Jens Axboe , Linux Kernel In-Reply-To: References: <5.1.1.6.2.20030215105330.00c84da8@pop.gmx.net> <5.1.1.6.2.20030215105330.00c84da8@pop.gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 731 Lines: 22 At 09:22 AM 2/15/2003 -0200, Rik van Riel wrote: >On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Mike Galbraith wrote: > >>I gave this a burn, and under hefty load it seems to provide a bit of >>anti-thrash benefit. > >Judging from your log, it ends up stalling kswapd and >dramatically increases the number of times that normal >processes need to go into the pageout code. > >If this provides an anti-thrashing benefit, something's >wrong with the VM in 2.5 ;) Which number are you looking at? -Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/