Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 06:54:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 06:54:28 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:43653 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 06:54:27 -0500 Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 04:03:24 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: clean up SLAB_KERNEL non-usage Message-ID: <20030215120324.GG29983@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030215114054.GA32256@holomorphy.com> <20030215114931.A18281@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030215114931.A18281@infradead.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 703 Lines: 17 On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 03:40:54AM -0800, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> Use SLAB_KERNEL and SLAB_ATOMIC instead of GFP_KERNEL and GFP_ATOMIC >> when passing args to slab allocation functions. On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 11:49:31AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Why? I'd prefer to completly get rid of the SLAB_ flags instead. > (stupid slowaris compat..) IMHO different API, different flags. The inverse is not that difficult to produce, though. -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/