Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 11:07:23 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 11:07:23 -0500 Received: from [195.223.140.107] ([195.223.140.107]:3200 "EHLO athlon.random") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 11:07:22 -0500 Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 17:18:21 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Jamie Lokier Cc: Thomas Molina , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alan Cox Subject: Re: openbkweb-0.0 Message-ID: <20030215161821.GC29194@dualathlon.random> References: <20030214203151.GL20159@fs.tum.de> <20030215003951.GB4333@bjl1.jlokier.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030215003951.GB4333@bjl1.jlokier.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-GPG-Key: 1024D/68B9CB43 X-PGP-Key: 1024R/CB4660B9 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2719 Lines: 49 On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 12:39:51AM +0000, Jamie Lokier wrote: > Imagine if all your friends started talking a different language, > called Binglish say. You'd want to talk to them in that language so > you could socialise and work with them. Now if they told you you must > sign a contract and join a private society, or pay significant cash, > otherwise you couldn't talk the language? If it were a few people > you'd ignore them, but if it seemed like all the really powerful > people who affect your life would just ignore you unless you talked > it, you'd be pissed off. You'd feel the playing field had become > unlevel and needed correction. You'd be tempted to either (1) cave in > and pay or join the private society, (2) learn the language and > use it anyway. nice comparison. However my short term concern is not to speak Binglish but just to translate from Binglish to English. We need access to the data with an open protocol and to backup the data in a open format. so we can use it too. And Larry is now going to provide the data in the open, IMHO only if that didn't happen we had to research into the possibility of legally reverse enegeneering the bitkeeper protocol. the fact he is now providing the data out in the open avoids us to waste time. After we can reach the data we can use any version control system we want to manage it, I'm going to write MORE STUPID scripts to do that. I'm been told of several giga archives with dozen thousand revisions under subversion for istance (I know Al Viro blamed subversion code but if the design it's good it may be a good start). subversion may not have all the features of bitkeeper but we can certainly add them over time, the only thing it matters to me is that we get rid of being forced to use a proprietary protocol to fetch the data. The kernel CVS in more than enough for my/our needs and I thank Larry for seeing it was necessary to allow the kernel data to be open. Now there's no reason to argue anymore with Larry or Linus, they can choose what they can legally use and we can choose what we can legally use and what we find more productive in the long run. I really believe in open protocols and open source software being superior and a necessary thing in the long run, it's not that I advocate people to use open source products and then I change my mind and I run proprietary apps to develop the kernel (I don't put a smile here because clearly this isn't an obvious thought). Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/