Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 13:58:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 13:58:58 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:44815 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 13:58:56 -0500 Message-ID: <3E4E9028.3090601@pobox.com> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 14:08:24 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021213 Debian/1.2.1-2.bunk X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Roger Luethi CC: Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [0/4][via-rhine] Improvements References: <20030215111705.GA11127@k3.hellgate.ch> In-Reply-To: <20030215111705.GA11127@k3.hellgate.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 935 Lines: 27 Roger Luethi wrote: > Here comes a batch of patches for the via-rhine driver. Please apply. > > via-rhine is still hardly usable on the most common Rhine hardware; it > can't sustain 100Mbps traffic. The changes presented here improve the > situation considerably; they fix a number of real problems and have been > tested for regression (alas, by few people). Looks good, all patches applied to 2.5. Should these apply to 2.4, too? Just a general comment, the reset logic seems a bit too much like voodoo magic ;-) It would be nice long-term to get an official answer from Via about the proper reset sequence and time limits. [regardless, like I said, patch applied...] Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/