Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932107AbbGaT6i (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 15:58:38 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:46612 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754811AbbGaT63 (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 15:58:29 -0400 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Lv Zheng , Bob Moore , "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: [PATCH 4.1 209/267] ACPICA: Tables: Enable both 32-bit and 64-bit FACS Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:41:00 -0700 Message-Id: <20150731194009.527223667@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.5.0 In-Reply-To: <20150731194001.933895871@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20150731194001.933895871@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 7900 Lines: 211 4.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Lv Zheng commit c04e1fb4396d27f18296db0f914760fa7fe8223a upstream. ACPICA commit f7b86f35416e3d1f71c3d816ff5075ddd33ed486 The following commit is reported to have broken s2ram on some platforms: Commit: 0249ed2444d65d65fc3f3f64f398f1ad0b7e54cd ACPICA: Add option to favor 32-bit FADT addresses. The platform reports 2 FACS tables (which is not allowed by ACPI specification) and the new 32-bit address favor rule forces OSPMs to use the FACS table reported via FADT's X_FIRMWARE_CTRL field. The root cause of the reported bug might be one of the followings: 1. BIOS may favor the 64-bit firmware waking vector address when the version of the FACS is greater than 0 and Linux currently only supports resuming from the real mode, so the 64-bit firmware waking vector has never been set and might be invalid to BIOS while the commit enables higher version FACS. 2. BIOS may favor the FACS reported via the "FIRMWARE_CTRL" field in the FADT while the commit doesn't set the firmware waking vector address of the FACS reported by "FIRMWARE_CTRL", it only sets the firware waking vector address of the FACS reported by "X_FIRMWARE_CTRL". This patch excludes the cases that can trigger the bugs caused by the root cause 2. There is no handshaking mechanism can be used by OSPM to tell BIOS which FACS is currently used. Thus the FACS reported by "FIRMWARE_CTRL" may still be used by BIOS and the 0 value of the 32-bit firmware waking vector might trigger such failure. This patch tries to favor 32bit FACS address in another way where both the FACS reported by "FIRMWARE_CTRL" and the FACS reported by "X_FIRMWARE_CTRL" are loaded so that further commit can set firmware waking vector in the both tables to ensure we can exclude the cases that trigger the bugs caused by the root cause 2. The exclusion is split into 2 commits as this commit is also useful for dumping more ACPI tables, it won't get reverted when such exclusion is no longer necessary. Lv Zheng. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74021 Link: https://github.com/acpica/acpica/commit/f7b86f35 Reported-and-tested-by: Oswald Buddenhagen Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng Signed-off-by: Bob Moore Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h | 1 + drivers/acpi/acpica/tbfadt.c | 21 +++++++++++++-------- drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------- drivers/acpi/acpica/tbxfload.c | 3 ++- include/acpi/acpixf.h | 9 +++++++++ 5 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/aclocal.h @@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ struct acpi_table_list { #define ACPI_TABLE_INDEX_DSDT (0) #define ACPI_TABLE_INDEX_FACS (1) +#define ACPI_TABLE_INDEX_X_FACS (2) struct acpi_find_context { char *search_for; --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbfadt.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbfadt.c @@ -350,9 +350,18 @@ void acpi_tb_parse_fadt(u32 table_index) /* If Hardware Reduced flag is set, there is no FACS */ if (!acpi_gbl_reduced_hardware) { - acpi_tb_install_fixed_table((acpi_physical_address) - acpi_gbl_FADT.Xfacs, ACPI_SIG_FACS, - ACPI_TABLE_INDEX_FACS); + if (acpi_gbl_FADT.facs) { + acpi_tb_install_fixed_table((acpi_physical_address) + acpi_gbl_FADT.facs, + ACPI_SIG_FACS, + ACPI_TABLE_INDEX_FACS); + } + if (acpi_gbl_FADT.Xfacs) { + acpi_tb_install_fixed_table((acpi_physical_address) + acpi_gbl_FADT.Xfacs, + ACPI_SIG_FACS, + ACPI_TABLE_INDEX_X_FACS); + } } } @@ -491,13 +500,9 @@ static void acpi_tb_convert_fadt(void) acpi_gbl_FADT.header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_table_fadt); /* - * Expand the 32-bit FACS and DSDT addresses to 64-bit as necessary. + * Expand the 32-bit DSDT addresses to 64-bit as necessary. * Later ACPICA code will always use the X 64-bit field. */ - acpi_gbl_FADT.Xfacs = acpi_tb_select_address("FACS", - acpi_gbl_FADT.facs, - acpi_gbl_FADT.Xfacs); - acpi_gbl_FADT.Xdsdt = acpi_tb_select_address("DSDT", acpi_gbl_FADT.dsdt, acpi_gbl_FADT.Xdsdt); --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbutils.c @@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ acpi_tb_get_root_table_entry(u8 *table_e acpi_status acpi_tb_initialize_facs(void) { - acpi_status status; + struct acpi_table_facs *facs32; + struct acpi_table_facs *facs64; /* If Hardware Reduced flag is set, there is no FACS */ @@ -77,11 +78,22 @@ acpi_status acpi_tb_initialize_facs(void return (AE_OK); } - status = acpi_get_table_by_index(ACPI_TABLE_INDEX_FACS, - ACPI_CAST_INDIRECT_PTR(struct - acpi_table_header, - &acpi_gbl_FACS)); - return (status); + (void)acpi_get_table_by_index(ACPI_TABLE_INDEX_FACS, + ACPI_CAST_INDIRECT_PTR(struct + acpi_table_header, + &facs32)); + (void)acpi_get_table_by_index(ACPI_TABLE_INDEX_X_FACS, + ACPI_CAST_INDIRECT_PTR(struct + acpi_table_header, + &facs64)); + + if (acpi_gbl_use32_bit_facs_addresses) { + acpi_gbl_FACS = facs32 ? facs32 : facs64; + } else { + acpi_gbl_FACS = facs64 ? facs64 : facs32; + } + + return (AE_OK); } #endif /* !ACPI_REDUCED_HARDWARE */ @@ -101,7 +113,7 @@ acpi_status acpi_tb_initialize_facs(void u8 acpi_tb_tables_loaded(void) { - if (acpi_gbl_root_table_list.current_table_count >= 3) { + if (acpi_gbl_root_table_list.current_table_count >= 4) { return (TRUE); } @@ -357,11 +369,11 @@ acpi_status __init acpi_tb_parse_root_ta table_entry = ACPI_ADD_PTR(u8, table, sizeof(struct acpi_table_header)); /* - * First two entries in the table array are reserved for the DSDT - * and FACS, which are not actually present in the RSDT/XSDT - they - * come from the FADT + * First three entries in the table array are reserved for the DSDT + * and 32bit/64bit FACS, which are not actually present in the + * RSDT/XSDT - they come from the FADT */ - acpi_gbl_root_table_list.current_table_count = 2; + acpi_gbl_root_table_list.current_table_count = 3; /* Initialize the root table array from the RSDT/XSDT */ --- a/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbxfload.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpica/tbxfload.c @@ -166,7 +166,8 @@ static acpi_status acpi_tb_load_namespac (void)acpi_ut_acquire_mutex(ACPI_MTX_TABLES); for (i = 0; i < acpi_gbl_root_table_list.current_table_count; ++i) { - if ((!ACPI_COMPARE_NAME + if (!acpi_gbl_root_table_list.tables[i].address || + (!ACPI_COMPARE_NAME (&(acpi_gbl_root_table_list.tables[i].signature), ACPI_SIG_SSDT) && --- a/include/acpi/acpixf.h +++ b/include/acpi/acpixf.h @@ -200,6 +200,15 @@ ACPI_INIT_GLOBAL(u8, acpi_gbl_do_not_use ACPI_INIT_GLOBAL(u8, acpi_gbl_use32_bit_fadt_addresses, TRUE); /* + * Optionally use 32-bit FACS table addresses. + * It is reported that some platforms fail to resume from system suspending + * if 64-bit FACS table address is selected: + * https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=74021 + * Default is TRUE, favor the 32-bit addresses. + */ +ACPI_INIT_GLOBAL(u8, acpi_gbl_use32_bit_facs_addresses, TRUE); + +/* * Optionally truncate I/O addresses to 16 bits. Provides compatibility * with other ACPI implementations. NOTE: During ACPICA initialization, * this value is set to TRUE if any Windows OSI strings have been -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/