Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 16:43:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 16:43:06 -0500 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:13268 "EHLO mail.bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 16:43:05 -0500 Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 13:52:59 -0800 From: Larry McVoy To: Davide Libenzi Cc: Larry McVoy , lkml Subject: Re: openbkweb-0.0 Message-ID: <20030215215259.GA22512@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , Davide Libenzi , Larry McVoy , lkml References: <20030214235724.GA24139@work.bitmover.com> <20030215181211.GA12315@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-MailScanner: Found to be clean Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1103 Lines: 24 On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 01:56:02PM -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote: > Larry, I already said this and maybe you missed it ( or maybe not ). > What about having a GPLed ( or whatever other license ), read-only BK > available for the ones that simply need to fetch stuff from BK > repositories ? You don't have to maintain another repository for > compatibility, and also you enforce BK usage. We're not going to expose the network protocol. For two reasons: - it works really well (we're proud of this) - it is really ugly (we're not proud of this :) A read only client isn't read only, it has to be read/write to update the out of date copy. Believe me, if there was an easy way to give away a version that was not a problem we would have long since done that. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/