Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 16:42:57 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 16:42:57 -0500 Received: from x35.xmailserver.org ([208.129.208.51]:33166 "EHLO x35.xmailserver.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 16:42:56 -0500 X-AuthUser: davidel@xmailserver.org Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 14:00:05 -0800 (PST) From: Davide Libenzi X-X-Sender: davide@blue1.dev.mcafeelabs.com To: Werner Almesberger cc: Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Synchronous signal delivery.. In-Reply-To: <20030215010837.D2791@almesberger.net> Message-ID: References: <20030215010837.D2791@almesberger.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 610 Lines: 20 On Sat, 15 Feb 2003, Werner Almesberger wrote: > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > What do you think about having timers through a file interface ? > > Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but couldn't you simply > do this with a signal handler that writes to (a) pipe(s) ? You could do that, even if when you start having many timers things might get messy. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/