Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751748AbbHBSDs (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Aug 2015 14:03:48 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0011.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.11]:33536 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751093AbbHBSDr (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Aug 2015 14:03:47 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1539:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:2393:2553:2559:2562:2828:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3352:3622:3865:3867:3868:3870:3871:3872:3874:4321:5007:6261:10004:10400:10848:11026:11232:11658:11914:12043:12517:12519:12740:13069:13311:13357:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: air01_5af56415ccc03 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 1730 Message-ID: <1438538623.1301.29.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Check return code from pdc20621_i2c_read() From: Joe Perches To: Tomer Barletz Cc: Sergei Shtylyov , tj@kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 11:03:43 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <1438510340-21568-1-git-send-email-barletz@gmail.com> <55BDFA5C.3040506@cogentembedded.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.0-fta1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 897 Lines: 24 On Sun, 2015-08-02 at 10:55 -0700, Tomer Barletz wrote: > Re-sending in plain-text. > > On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 4:09 AM, Sergei Shtylyov > wrote: > > > Please use pr_err() instead. And "0x%d" makes no sense at all, > > please use "%#x" instead. > > > > Yeah, not sure what I was drinking before writing this 0x%d thing... > > Regarding the pr_err() - it is not used at all in this file, and > printk() is used instead. Wouldn't it be better to leave it with > printk for this change, then have another change that replaces > printk()s with pr_err()s? Where possible, it'd be better to use ata_dev_ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/