Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 19:38:09 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 19:38:09 -0500 Received: from c16639.thoms1.vic.optusnet.com.au ([210.49.244.5]:17284 "EHLO mail.kolivas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 19:38:08 -0500 From: Con Kolivas To: Zwane Mwaikambo Subject: Re: tbench as a load - DDOS attack? Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2003 11:48:02 +1100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 Cc: linux kernel mailing list References: <200302161007.25149.kernel@kolivas.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200302161148.02045.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1127 Lines: 30 On Sun, 16 Feb 2003 10:24 am, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > On Sun, 16 Feb 2003, Con Kolivas wrote: > > Zwane M suggested using tbench as a load to test one of his recent > > patches and gave me the idea to try using tbench_load in contest. Here > > are the first set of results I got while running tbench 4 continuously > > (uniprocessor machine): > > > > tbench_load: > > Kernel [runs] Time CPU% > > test2420 1 180 38.9 > > test2561 1 970 7.7 > > > > This is a massive difference. Sure tbench was giving better numbers on > > 2.5.61 but it caused a massive slowdown. I wondered whether this > > translates into being more susceptible to ping floods or DDOS attacks? > > You should have seen tbench 16 - 3546 seconds! > > > > comments? > > Are you running this via loopback? Can you send a profile during the > 2.4.20 run? Loopback. Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/