Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751947AbbHBWAL (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Aug 2015 18:00:11 -0400 Received: from dd34104.kasserver.com ([85.13.151.79]:49471 "EHLO dd34104.kasserver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750972AbbHBWAJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 Aug 2015 18:00:09 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-SenderIP: 149.172.53.229 User-Agent: ALL-INKL Webmail 2.11 In-Reply-To: <55B79FCA.7070907@redhat.com> References: <1437960486-2809-1-git-send-email-public_timo.s@silentcreek.de> <55B5E6DB.8020009@redhat.com> <20150727120918.191F76C82FB4@dd34104.kasserver.com> <55B62768.6040403@redhat.com> <20150728124911.GA2564@lukather><55B790BA.5000509@redhat.com> <20150728150929.233B56C80391@dd34104.kasserver.com><55B79FCA.7070907@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] [RFC] ARM: dts: sunxi: Add regulators and board-specific operating points for LeMaker BananaPi From: "Timo Sigurdsson" To: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca Cc: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, hdegoede@redhat.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, wens@csie.org Message-Id: <20150802220006.E5BE06C810BC@dd34104.kasserver.com> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 00:00:06 +0200 (CEST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1284 Lines: 31 Hi Stefan, you didn't include me in your answer, hence the late reply... Stefan Monnier schrieb am 29.07.2015 02:02: >> IMHO for a common maximum opp that's a good approach. But for the lowest >> frequency setting, it would seem more logical to me, to raise the voltage >> to a point where all boards will run fine with them, unless those boards >> cannot handle the frequency regardless of the higher voltage. > I generally agre, tho IIRC some measurements seem to indicate that the > lowest frequency settings did not bring much (if any) reduction in power > consumption, making them rather useless. That's an interesting point. However, that would be a different discussion. I wouldn't mind if the 144MHz would be removed - my point was just that if it's supposed to be a common setting, it should work on all boards. I posted a patch today to fix this. [1] That might be a good place to discuss whether this setting should be removed entirely. Regards, Timo [1] https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/linux-sunxi/fIfbdn7mrQA -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/