Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 20:35:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 20:35:20 -0500 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:9864 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 15 Feb 2003 20:35:20 -0500 Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2003 17:44:15 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Oliver Neukum Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: clean up SLAB_KERNEL non-usage Message-ID: <20030216014415.GL29983@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Oliver Neukum , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030215114054.GA32256@holomorphy.com> <200302151658.59007.oliver@neukum.name> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200302151658.59007.oliver@neukum.name> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 654 Lines: 16 Am Samstag, 15. Februar 2003 12:40 schrieb William Lee Irwin III: >> Use SLAB_KERNEL and SLAB_ATOMIC instead of GFP_KERNEL and GFP_ATOMIC >> when passing args to slab allocation functions. On Sat, Feb 15, 2003 at 04:58:58PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote: > What is this distinction supposed to do anyway? > Can't we just drop it? That's why I followed up with patches that remove them in favor of GFP_* -- wli - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/