Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754595AbbHDC1v (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2015 22:27:51 -0400 Received: from smtprelay0027.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.27]:33713 "EHLO smtprelay.hostedemail.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751585AbbHDC1t (ORCPT ); Mon, 3 Aug 2015 22:27:49 -0400 X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-Spam-Summary: 2,0,0,,d41d8cd98f00b204,joe@perches.com,:::::::::::,RULES_HIT:41:152:355:379:541:599:800:960:973:988:989:1260:1277:1311:1313:1314:1345:1359:1373:1437:1515:1516:1518:1534:1541:1593:1594:1711:1730:1747:1777:1792:1801:1981:2194:2199:2393:2553:2559:2562:2693:3138:3139:3140:3141:3142:3353:3622:3865:3866:3868:3870:3872:4321:4605:5007:6119:6261:7514:7903:9036:9149:10004:10400:10848:11232:11658:11914:12517:12519:12555:12740:13069:13311:13357:13894:21080,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:fn,MSBL:0,DNSBL:none,Custom_rules:0:0:0 X-HE-Tag: jewel76_26d0157a0a423 X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2857 Message-ID: <1438655265.10829.0.camel@perches.com> Subject: Re: [TRIVIAL PATCH] block: Correct misuses of 0x% From: Joe Perches To: yalin wang Cc: Don Brace , open list , iss_storagedev@hp.com, storagedev@pmcs.com, linux-scsi Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 19:27:45 -0700 In-Reply-To: References: <1438547113.29569.5.camel@perches.com> <9547AF94-2168-4987-AD89-B7F111084CC2@gmail.com> <1438589026.30149.15.camel@perches.com> <67B9124A-73E8-4AA1-81E5-18FAC69D3962@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.11-0ubuntu3 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1975 Lines: 51 On Tue, 2015-08-04 at 10:19 +0800, yalin wang wrote: > Ping ? > > On Aug 3, 2015, at 16:56, yalin wang wrote: > > > > > >> On Aug 3, 2015, at 16:03, Joe Perches wrote: > >> > >> On Mon, 2015-08-03 at 15:25 +0800, yalin wang wrote: > >>>> On Aug 3, 2015, at 04:25, Joe Perches wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Correct misuse of 0x%d in logging messages. > >>>> > >> [] > >>> why not use like this : dev_dbg(&h->pdev->dev, " Max outstanding > >>> commands = %#x\n” ? > >>> %#x will add 0x prefix automatically . > >> > >> It's generally a consistency thing. > >> A 0 value would be emitted as 0 and not 0x0. > >> > > i try on my ubuntu , > > > > static int __init throtl_init(void) > > { > > printk("module init test: %#x %p\n", 0, (void *)0x123); > > return 0; > > > > } > > > > module_init(throtl_init); > > > > #uname -a > > Linux ubuntu 3.16.0-38-generic #52~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Fri May 8 09:43:57 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux > > > > #dmesg > > [259356.375586] module init test: 0x0 0000000000000123 > > > > it seems don’t need 0x%x for 0, just need %#x for all numbers. > > there are lots of use like this, i can change them if needed: > > > > # egrep -r -i '0x%\d*x' . | wc -l > > 11776 I suggest not, it's not a standard usage and the 0 may be unexpected. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/