Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 16:37:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 16:37:21 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:38828 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 16:37:06 -0500 From: "David S. Miller" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14990.61040.981618.913167@pizda.ninka.net> Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 13:34:40 -0800 (PST) To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Jes Sorensen , G?rard Roudier , Alan Cox , Donald Becker , Linux-Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] starfire reads irq before pci_enable_device. In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 13) "Crater Lake" XEmacs Lucid Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik writes: > And in another message, On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, David S. Miller wrote: > > 3) The acenic/gbit performance anomalies have been cured > > by reverting the PCI mem_inval tweaks. > > > Just to be clear, acenic should or should not use MWI? > > And can a general rule be applied here? Newer Tulip hardware also > has the ability to enable/disable MWI usage, IIRC. I think this is an Acenic specific issue. The second processor on the Acenic board is only there to work around bugs in their DMA controller. Later, David S. Miller davem@redhat.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/