Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755189AbbHDIiY (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2015 04:38:24 -0400 Received: from dd34104.kasserver.com ([85.13.151.79]:37095 "EHLO dd34104.kasserver.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751294AbbHDIiW (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Aug 2015 04:38:22 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT X-SenderIP: 153.96.32.62 User-Agent: ALL-INKL Webmail 2.11 In-Reply-To: <20150803091300.GY2564@lukather> References: <1438543386-7253-1-git-send-email-public_timo.s@silentcreek.de><20150803091300.GY2564@lukather> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: dts: sunxi: Raise minimum CPU voltage for sun7i-a20 to a level all boards can supply From: "Timo Sigurdsson" To: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, pawel.moll@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk, galak@codeaurora.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, wens@csie.org Message-Id: <20150804083819.2F3EE6C83EF9@dd34104.kasserver.com> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:38:19 +0200 (CEST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1264 Lines: 32 Hi Maxime, Maxime Ripard schrieb am 03.08.2015 11:13: > On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 09:23:06PM +0200, Timo Sigurdsson wrote: >> sun7i-a20.dtsi contains an cpufreq operating point at 0.9 volts. Most A20 >> boards >> (or all?), however, do not allow the voltage to go below 1.0V. Thus, raise the >> voltage for the lowest operating point to 1.0V so all boards can actually use >> it. > > This is not a property of a board, but is the actual limit documented > by Allwinner for the A20. Some individual SoCs might have wider > tolerances, but that's not a property of a board, it's really a > property of a single SoC, and we cannot make any assumption on the > board. Thanks for the clarification. That was a misunderstanding on my side. I can update the commit message in a second version of the patch, but the actual code change can be kept as is then, I guess. > (and please make sure to run checkpatch before sending your patches) Sorry about that. Will do when I post a second version of the patch. Thanks, Timo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/