Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752442AbbHEJZB (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2015 05:25:01 -0400 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:34840 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752277AbbHEJY5 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2015 05:24:57 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:24:51 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Jason Low Cc: Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker , Oleg Nesterov , "Paul E. McKenney" , Davidlohr Bueso , Mike Galbraith , terry.rudd@hp.com, Rik van Riel , Waiman Long , Scott J Norton Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] timer: Improve itimers scalability Message-ID: <20150805092451.GU25159@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1438734584.2927.15.camel@j-VirtualBox> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1438734584.2927.15.camel@j-VirtualBox> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 643 Lines: 15 On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 05:29:44PM -0700, Jason Low wrote: > When running a database workload on a 16 socket machine, there were > scalability issues related to itimers. I very much hope you're also trying to convince the relevant database people that using process wide timers on something they expect to scale is a horrendously stupid idea? Nothing obviously broken stood out, but *shees* :-) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/