Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753835AbbHEQKJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2015 12:10:09 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f170.google.com ([209.85.212.170]:36641 "EHLO mail-wi0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753096AbbHEQKE (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2015 12:10:04 -0400 Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 17:10:00 +0100 From: Matt Fleming To: "Zhang, Jonathan Zhixiong" Cc: Borislav Petkov , Will Deacon , Matt Fleming , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , "x86@kernel.org" , "tony.luck@gmail.com" , "ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org" , "fu.wei@linaro.org" , "al.stone@linaro.org" , "rjw@rjwysocki.net" , "lenb@kernel.org" , "ying.huang@intel.com" , Catalin Marinas , "leif.lindholm@linaro.org" , "hanjun.guo@linaro.org" , "linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , "linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org" , "vgandhi@codeaurora.org" , "timur@codeaurora.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 0/5] map GHES memory region according to EFI memory map Message-ID: <20150805161000.GE4332@codeblueprint.co.uk> References: <1438292109-4170-1-git-send-email-zjzhang@codeaurora.org> <20150803112658.GE10501@arm.com> <20150803162354.GQ2725@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20150804042552.GG31787@nazgul.tnic> <55C0DD30.9070800@codeaurora.org> <20150805092125.GB4332@codeblueprint.co.uk> <55C232BC.1010107@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55C232BC.1010107@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 764 Lines: 21 On Wed, 05 Aug, at 08:58:52AM, Zhang, Jonathan Zhixiong wrote: > > Yes, absolutely. It has been in my mind, sorry I was tied up in the last > few days. I wonder what I may missed, I certainly do x86 build test with > versions of the patch set. > > I will try today and report back. No problem. I'd suggest moving the implementation into include/acpi/apei.h and leaving it as static inline instead of implementing it out of line in arch/x86/kernel/acpi/apei.c. -- Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/