Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 11:53:20 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 11:53:20 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:22539 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 11:53:19 -0500 Message-ID: <3E5115BB.6020407@pobox.com> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 12:02:51 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021213 Debian/1.2.1-2.bunk X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Osamu Tomita CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Alan Cox , "'Christoph Hellwig'" Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] PC-9800 subarch. support for 2.5.61 (16/26) NIC References: <20030217134333.GA4734@yuzuki.cinet.co.jp> <20030217141552.GP4799@yuzuki.cinet.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20030217141552.GP4799@yuzuki.cinet.co.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 488 Lines: 14 > -#ifdef __ISAPNP__ > +#if defined(__ISAPNP__) && !defined(CONFIG_X86_PC9800) I am curious, does PC9800 support ISAPNP at all? Perhaps a dumb question, but I wonder if the above ifdef can be simplified by turning off ISAPNP on PC9800? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/