Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752598AbbHGEOF (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2015 00:14:05 -0400 Received: from mailout4.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.14]:17673 "EHLO mailout4.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750869AbbHGEOC (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2015 00:14:02 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfec7f4-f79c56d0000012ee-e7-55c430875049 Message-id: <55C43085.8090506@samsung.com> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 13:13:57 +0900 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: Viresh Kumar , Kukjin Kim , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann Cc: "'Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz'" , "'Thomas Abraham'" , "'Sylwester Nawrocki'" , "'Michael Turquette'" , "'Tomasz Figa'" , "'Lukasz Majewski'" , "'Heiko Stuebner'" , "'Chanwoo Choi'" , "'Kevin Hilman'" , "'Javier Martinez Canillas'" , "'Tobias Jakobi'" , "'Anand Moon'" , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for Exynos4x12 platform References: <1438868514-8814-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> <015301d0d0a3$1396c900$3ac45b00$@kernel.org> <20150807035018.GF6325@linux> <20150807035156.GG6325@linux> In-reply-to: <20150807035156.GG6325@linux> Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrBIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t/xa7rtBkdCDabM5bFY2eNtsXHGelaL 61+es1r8f/Sa1eLa7xlsFq9fGFr0P37NbPH18ApGizcPNzNabHp8jdXiY889VovLu+awWXzu PcJoMeP8PiaLdRtvsVtcPOVqcer6ZzaLM6cvsVocftPOatGxjNGibfUHVotVu/4wWmz86uEg 7vH+Riu7x9/ZrcweO2fdZffYtKqTzePOtT1sHpuX1HtcOdHE6vHvGLvHlqvtLB59W1Yxemy/ No/Z4/MmuQCeKC6blNSczLLUIn27BK6MPycnMRfs4KvYcOMBawPjAe4uRk4OCQETiV+v7rJC 2GISF+6tZ+ti5OIQEljKKDH96ikmCOcLo0TPmV/MIFW8AloSU+9fBOtgEVCV2L1rPROIzSZg LLF5+RI2EFtUIEJi+eqTjBD1ghI/Jt9jARkkInCQUWLNmUawImaBw6wSHRuEQGxhgSiJQ7e3 MkJs28Io8af/NDtIghNo2/RpF4C2cQA16Encv6gF0SsvsXnNW+YJjAKzkOyYhVA1C0nVAkbm VYyiqaXJBcVJ6bmGesWJucWleel6yfm5mxgh8ftlB+PiY1aHGAU4GJV4eBP+HQ4VYk0sK67M PcQowcGsJML7UB8oxJuSWFmVWpQfX1Sak1p8iFGag0VJnHfurvchQgLpiSWp2ampBalFMFkm Dk6pBsaU+xctMz9/uKLyJJp3aV164NZG0zNaEaUq/zQYMlK53z68ZOv3+X8d56fXy540X/5Y GywUU9j94MwT3VmiWZF7SjeV29ln8c6X2yLw/5Dzon1qAqLPz64ILpXM2l+uxuy7M02xKb7c 99bJ4x9kzxfX/LSfvjTmZ3W40t4TizWq5qvFLWnK61ViKc5INNRiLipOBABX3WpL2wIAAA== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2046 Lines: 52 On 07.08.2015 12:51, Viresh Kumar wrote: > Fixed Olof's email id.. > > On 07-08-15, 09:20, Viresh Kumar wrote: >> Cc'ing Rafael again. Guys please don't miss him for any PM related >> stuff or use get_maintainers .. >> >> Cc'ing Arnd/Olof as well to discuss the merge stuff.. >> >> On 07-08-15, 08:53, Kukjin Kim wrote: >>>> Depends on: >>>> - next-20150806 branch of linux-next kernel tree >>>> - "[PATCH V3 00/16] OPP: Add code to support operating-points-v2 bindings" >>>> (http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg435408.html) >>>> >>> BTW, hmm...how can we see this series in v4.3?...to be honest, I don't think it >>> can be done in v4.3 because of dependencies with PM / OPP series >> >> That is merged by Rafael Yesterday. That is manageable Indeed, happy to hear it! So the patchset has no external dependencies. >> >>> and previous >>> exynos CPU OPP series in each cross trees...maybe that's why you created based >>> on linux-next...any idea? >> >> So there is no build dependency with OPP patches I hope, as its all >> about using the bindings defined by them. And so you don't need to >> depend on that. >> >> You might have to rebase on the ARM tree to manage your conflicts. In >> this case you can rebase directly on ARM SoC branch which has your >> patches (rebase directly over the last patch instead of the whole >> branch) and make sure Olof knows about this and he doesn't update >> (i.e. rebase) his branch, which he might not anyway. >> >> The whole idea is to keep a single sha-id for a commit. So you can >> rebase over the published material present in ARM-SoC .. Still patches 1/6 and 6/6 need your acks. Is the patch 1/6 a prerequisite for others? It does not look like a prerequisite... but it was put at the beginning of the patchset. Best regards, Krzysztof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/