Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 10:48:26 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.org>,
        "'Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz'" <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>,
        "'Thomas Abraham'" <thomas.ab@samsung.com>,
        "'Sylwester Nawrocki'" <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>,
        "'Michael Turquette'" <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
        "'Tomasz Figa'" <tomasz.figa@gmail.com>,
        "'Lukasz Majewski'" <l.majewski@samsung.com>,
        "'Heiko Stuebner'" <heiko@sntech.de>,
        "'Chanwoo Choi'" <cw00.choi@samsung.com>,
        "'Kevin Hilman'" <khilman@linaro.org>,
        "'Javier Martinez Canillas'" <javier@dowhile0.org>,
        "'Tobias Jakobi'" <tjakobi@math.uni-bielefeld.de>,
        "'Anand Moon'" <linux.amoon@gmail.com>,
        linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for
 Exynos4x12 platform
Message-ID: <20150807051826.GJ6325@linux>
References: <1438868514-8814-1-git-send-email-b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
 <015301d0d0a3$1396c900$3ac45b00$@kernel.org>
 <20150807035018.GF6325@linux>
 <20150807035156.GG6325@linux>
 <55C43085.8090506@samsung.com>
 <20150807043037.GH6325@linux>
 <55C43971.5010504@samsung.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <55C43971.5010504@samsung.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1110
Lines: 32

On 07-08-15, 13:52, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Thanks for explanation. As fair as I understand, Bartlomiej wanted to
> merge this in a way which would avoid loosing the boost mode. Kukjin
> prepared topic branches for previous cpu-freq/clk stuff so maybe
> everything could go through PM?

We aren't loosing anything at all. There can be two cases here:

1. Patch 1/6 and 6/6 make it to 4.3 (with suggested changes) via PM tree:
- All will work fine in this case, no issues at all..

2. They don't make it:
- Even in this case, nothing will break. Users can just enable a
  config option and that's all..

So, no need to divert things into another tree this late.

Over that, Rafael will not be around for 2 weeks now (Plumbers and
other stuff) ..

So, just target the cpufreq core changes via PM tree.. rest is just
fine.

I hope that makes sense :)

-- 
viresh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/