Message-ID: <55C47D5C.8060905@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 10:41:48 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
CC: agross@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
        Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
        Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 7/7] ARM: dts: ifc6410: add inforce LVDS panel support
References: <1438087956-17307-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> <1438088076-17606-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> <55B957B4.40501@codeaurora.org>
In-Reply-To: <55B957B4.40501@codeaurora.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1973
Lines: 53


On 29/07/15 23:46, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/28/2015 05:54 AM, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>> +
>> +        panel_3p3v: panel_3p3v {
>> +            compatible = "regulator-fixed";
>> +            pinctrl-0 = <&disp_en_gpios>;
>> +            pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +            regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> +            regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
>> +            regulator-name = "panel_en_3p3v";
>> +            regulator-type = "voltage";
>> +            startup-delay-us = <0>;
>> +            gpio = <&pm8921_gpio 36 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> +            enable-active-high;
>> +            regulator-boot-on;
>> +        };
>
> We should put gpio regulators into their own container in the root of
> the tree. Similar to what was done for 8960 gpio regulators.
I agree, Will do this in next version.
>
>> +
>> +        backlight: backlight{
>> +            pinctrl-0 = <&pwm_bl_gpios>;
>> +            pinctrl-names = "default";
>> +            compatible = "gpio-backlight";
>> +            gpios = <&pm8921_gpio 26 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> +            default-on;
>> +        };
>> +
>> +        panel: auo,b101xtn01 {
>> +            status = "okay";
>> +            compatible = "auo,b101xtn01";
>> +
>> +            ddc-i2c-bus = <&i2c3>;
>> +            backlight = <&backlight>;
>> +            power-supply = <&panel_3p3v>;
>>           };
>
> These two nodes shouldn't be under the SoC node. They don't have
> registers so they should be at the root of the tree. And we don't need
> to put labels twice on nodes. If we're modifying things in board
> specific dtsi files it should be fine to leave the label off if the
> label is in the SoC dtsi file.
Yep, will fix it in next version.
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/