Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030211AbbHGOaQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2015 10:30:16 -0400 Received: from mail-qk0-f170.google.com ([209.85.220.170]:33831 "EHLO mail-qk0-f170.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753898AbbHGOaF (ORCPT ); Fri, 7 Aug 2015 10:30:05 -0400 From: Paul Moore To: Richard Guy Briggs Cc: Steve Grubb , linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 3/3] audit: add audit by children of executable path Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 10:30:02 -0400 Message-ID: <6430018.ENq3ajkyRS@sifl> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.2-gentoo; KDE/4.14.10; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20150807063715.GB23800@madcap2.tricolour.ca> References: <14f057b6cb8.2852.85c95baa4474aabc7814e68940a78392@paul-moore.com> <20150807063715.GB23800@madcap2.tricolour.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 910 Lines: 24 On Friday, August 07, 2015 02:37:15 AM Richard Guy Briggs wrote: > On 15/08/06, Paul Moore wrote: > > > I guess what I'm saying is that I'm not currently convinced that > > there is enough value in this to offset the risk I feel the loop > > presents. I understand the use cases that you are mentioning, the > > are the same as the last time we discussed this, but I'm going to > > need something better than that. > > Can you better describe the loop that concerns you? I don't quite see > it. It would be the only loop in the patch, look at the for loop in audit_filter_rules() which iterates up the process' parent chain. -- paul moore www.paul-moore.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/