Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 18:46:32 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 18:46:31 -0500 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:17418 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 18:46:31 -0500 Message-ID: <3E517695.6000900@pobox.com> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 18:56:05 -0500 From: Jeff Garzik Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021213 Debian/1.2.1-2.bunk X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pavel Machek CC: Christoph Hellwig , Linus Torvalds , Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: Linux v2.5.61 References: <20030215183555.A22045@infradead.org> <3E4E8AB0.4040600@pobox.com> <20030216213244.GB2546@elf.ucw.cz> In-Reply-To: <20030216213244.GB2546@elf.ucw.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 607 Lines: 18 Pavel Machek wrote: >>Agreed, though Pat or Andy G are better people to tell this... it's only >>a "bk mv" away for either of them :) > > > *Bad* idea, as it will introduce unneccessary rejects for anyone > having any change to acpi... hmmm... this sounds like NotAProblem for anybody using a decent SCM, or downstream from someone using a decent SCM :) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/