Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2992455AbbHHPNZ (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Aug 2015 11:13:25 -0400 Received: from pandora.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:44954 "EHLO pandora.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964776AbbHHPNY (ORCPT ); Sat, 8 Aug 2015 11:13:24 -0400 Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:13:10 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Sascha Hauer Cc: Lucas Stach , Thierry Reding , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] drm: bridge/dw_hdmi: Cache edid data Message-ID: <20150808151310.GA4644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1438955961-27232-1-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <1438955961-27232-2-git-send-email-s.hauer@pengutronix.de> <20150807141346.GH7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1438957247.2467.17.camel@pengutronix.de> <20150807224028.GI7557@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20150808133540.GA934@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150808133540.GA934@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1651 Lines: 33 On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 02:35:40PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > I have a whole bunch of further patches for dw-hdmi, so if you don't > mind, I'll take your two, merge them on the front of my series, and > re-post them. I think we're getting close to the time where we can > see initial audio support merged for dw-hdmi. Having tried to apply the patches on top of my previous pull request to David (sent on 15th July), it would be much better if we waited. David is away at the moment, apparently due back in a little over a week's time. Hence, there's no processing of any development pull requests at the moment, which is why it hasn't shown up in linux-next. My series is based on 9203dd016a5d ("ALSA: pcm: add IEC958 channel status helper") which pre-dates the fixes to get_modes() to return non-zero, which are already in Linus' tree. I _could_ rebase it, but that's not good practice once it's been asked to be pulled. At the moment, my tree does not introduce any conflicts. Trying to merge your patch will create conflicts: if I merge the fix into my tree, we end up with duplicate commits. If I tweak your patch to apply to my tree as the code used to stand, git will end up with two conflicting changes. If I merge mainline into my tree, Linus doesn't like cross-merges. -- FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up according to speedtest.net. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/