Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:04:46 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:04:45 -0500 Received: from almesberger.net ([63.105.73.239]:64264 "EHLO host.almesberger.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:04:04 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 11:14:00 -0300 From: Werner Almesberger To: Roman Zippel Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Is an alternative module interface needed/possible? Message-ID: <20030218111400.U2092@almesberger.net> References: <20030217221837.Q2092@almesberger.net> <20030218050349.44B092C04E@lists.samba.org> <20030218042042.R2092@almesberger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: ; from zippel@linux-m68k.org on Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 01:35:13PM +0100 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 889 Lines: 23 Roman Zippel wrote: > Um, another point, let's ignore "minimum invasive migration plans", if we > found a good solution, we can still figure out how to get there smoothly, > so this shouldn't be a primary concern. In my next posting, I just wrote (this very minute) "For brainstorming's sake, let's not worry about backward-compatibility for now:" So I guess I don't need this disclaimer then ;-) - Werner -- _________________________________________________________________________ / Werner Almesberger, Buenos Aires, Argentina wa@almesberger.net / /_http://www.almesberger.net/____________________________________________/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/