Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:32:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:32:25 -0500 Received: from fmr05.intel.com ([134.134.136.6]:45797 "EHLO hermes.jf.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:32:24 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Grover, Andrew" To: Shawn Starr , Linux Kernel Mailing List Cc: Simone Piunno , Grover@unaropia, Adam Belay Subject: RE: 2.5.xx ACPI/Sb16 IRQ conflict Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 09:42:10 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) content-class: urn:content-classes:message Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 997 Lines: 29 > From: Shawn Starr [mailto:shawn.starr@datawire.net] > I can confirm this with 2.5.61 and my SB16AWE card. There > seems to be a bug > when PCI interrupts are set by ACPI on a IBM 300PL 6892-N2U. > > Also, the IBM BIOS's PnP for OS is enabled. > > When the PnP BIOS is disabled and pci=noacpi is NOT used. > There are no > conflicts. When PnP BIOS is enabled and we don't set > pci=noacpi we get > conflicts with IRQs. Hmmm, yes. > >ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] enabled at IRQ 5 There should have been a previous line about LNKD, listing possible interrupts for it -- what did that line say? Clearly, either we need another IRQ for LNKD or we PnPISA needs to assign a different IRQ - some coordination is needed here. Regards -- Andy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/