Message-ID: <55C9BF51.5080401@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:54:33 +0530
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@ti.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
CC: "Franklin S Cooper Jr." <fcooper@ti.com>, <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>, <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>,
        <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, <galak@codeaurora.org>,
        <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        <pawel.moll@arm.com>, <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@list.infradead.org>, <ssantosh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND][PATCH 3/4] ARM: davinci: Set proper SPI prescale limit
 value
References: <1437568344-18889-1-git-send-email-fcooper@ti.com> <1437568344-18889-4-git-send-email-fcooper@ti.com> <55B22681.3060000@ti.com> <55C9380D.1060802@ti.com> <55C99D0D.9050605@ti.com> <20150811090342.GG10748@sirena.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20150811090342.GG10748@sirena.org.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1419
Lines: 35

On Tuesday 11 August 2015 02:33 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:28:21PM +0530, Sekhar Nori wrote:
>> On Tuesday 11 August 2015 05:17 AM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
> 
>>> ping. Patches 1 and 2 have already been pulled into Mark's spi tree and are currently in in linux-next.
> 
>> Mark, can you apply this patch to your tree as well? Thats the preferred
>> route for me.
> 
>> If thats not an option for you, can you confirm that the topic/davinci
>> branch of your spi tree is an immutable commit I can base my pull
>> request to ARM-SoC on?
> 
> Why would there be any interdependency between the the two trees, that
> would be very unusual?  Adding a new value to DT doesn't need the kernel
> to understand it and the driver should be compatible with existing DTs.
> If there *is* some dependency that suggests the driver update has
> problems...

The dependency is because of platform data. Patch 2/4 adds a new
platform data member 'prescaler_limit' which this patch populates for
DaVinci devices using legacy booting.

> In any case I don't have a copy of the patch any more.

I can resend this patch to you with my ack included.

Thanks,
Sekhar

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/