Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932222AbbHKTA3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:00:29 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([149.20.54.216]:51043 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752525AbbHKTA2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:00:28 -0400 Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:00:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20150811.120027.1186256660854311012.davem@davemloft.net> To: vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com Cc: f.fainelli@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@savoirfairelinux.com, linux@roeck-us.net, andrew@lunn.ch, sfeldma@gmail.com, jiri@resnulli.us Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: support switchdev FDB objects From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20150811.115249.1843804028134252781.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20150811.110708.2068514265578197752.davem@davemloft.net> <1084602462.1280363.1439317122548.JavaMail.zimbra@savoirfairelinux.com> <20150811.115249.1843804028134252781.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.6 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Tue, 11 Aug 2015 12:00:28 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1272 Lines: 38 From: David Miller Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:52:49 -0700 (PDT) > From: Vivien Didelot > Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:18:42 -0400 (EDT) > >> On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:07 PM, David davem@davemloft.net wrote: >> >>> From: Florian Fainelli >>> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 11:03:35 -0700 >>> >>>> Put differently, my question is how do you value not rewriting >>>> history vs. breaking bisectability (by accident of course)? >>> >>> I never will rewrite history, ever. >>> >>> Too many people clone my tree and depend upon it. >> >> Sorry, I still don't understand. What are the consequences of: >> >> git revert -m 1 f1d5ca4 >> >> Then applying v3? > > In this scenerio I think a relative fixup works better. > >> You already did that in the past: >> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/1f2cd84 > > Each and every situation is evaluated by me on a case by case > basis. Ok, if you guys really want me to I'll do the revert-reapply thing. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/