Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932522AbbHKT3y (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:29:54 -0400 Received: from shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk ([88.96.1.126]:50023 "EHLO shadbolt.e.decadent.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932186AbbHKT3w (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Aug 2015 15:29:52 -0400 Message-ID: <1439321374.10857.60.camel@decadent.org.uk> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 000/110] 3.2.71-rc1 review From: Ben Hutchings To: Jonathan Toppins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Guenter Roeck , Phil Jensen , akpm@linux-foundation.org Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 21:29:34 +0200 In-Reply-To: <55CA4B1F.7030508@cumulusnetworks.com> References: <55CA4B1F.7030508@cumulusnetworks.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-FnefB5NCjdnGZpJcX5zC" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.3-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 141.70.72.77 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ben@decadent.org.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on shadbolt.decadent.org.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2591 Lines: 70 --=-FnefB5NCjdnGZpJcX5zC Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2015-08-11 at 15:21 -0400, Jonathan Toppins wrote: > On 08/10/2015 06:12 AM, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.2.71 release. > > There are 110 patches in this series, which will be posted as responses > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > let me know. > >=20 > > Responses should be made by Wed Aug 12 11:00:00 UTC 2015. > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > >=20 > > A combined patch relative to 3.2.70 will be posted as an additional > > response to this. A shortlog and diffstat can be found below. > >=20 >=20 > Was thinking I would see upstream commit=20 > b6878d9e03043695dbf3fa1caa6dfc09db225b16, overlooked? >=20 > Has been backported by at least Debian in their 3.2 kernel, version=20 > 3.2.68-1+deb7u3, to fix CVE-2015-5697. Funnily enough, I am aware of that. :-) > Maybe this upstream commit is too new and so it will show up in a later= =20 > 3.2 stable version? Yes, it is too new (only released in 4.2-rc6, and I looked for fixes up to 4.2-rc5). Ben. --=20 Ben Hutchings Theory and practice are closer in theory than in practice. - John Levine, moderator of comp.compilers --=-FnefB5NCjdnGZpJcX5zC Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIVAwUAVcpNHue/yOyVhhEJAQoAow/7BurPVsxtz3zdbqK7/w+QfuPH3WH5pXu6 7QkzZta7aB7G/WokHWAGz6loYijd1K9nTza5kyr92r+7By34JBTA0NmbQ9PboVqD BKcyulvZ8IVJFO4Aprbmm9B7SKKQyBvT4ajWdJKLb6Gckd7qMKeBrFqkJdjUhpow nyR2up/WjzjcfzaqMcO9OORyFmqNwBVi2S7B2pAvT543+mt3/pG/ffyOmlCnNX6t AFR2P1qveBu/bfDo52M49b2oHkG5vBN4kYE6X3kqH18avkk4IMl8fEBWkqQDK8b4 wZQr7N6Q3ZvDDAQKIk13zp7hjOQBYSQJWmlzvYgbPFE2iURpe9Rol9+CLeWk+XI2 2Vzd/Ualka9SHpEbR9p6+CJoRP4tGvCt+BsqAXEwm7WaApCzpllRPGaQ9+4KMVzi 6T1/bn4bHlBB4JgB0ssgWQNgmdkMHLwCMkLnyWqQdcvzyHSZQ1lUqnACeQHANpkF gPl8m2whm9IB1+MMiXykYJ7BTRmpRbEm9pYs0fsiq0WD+1olGr+HrFjnu1P5mFbi nCwnmwupXup3/7ZTX46W30+OMo/BkZA4DSnLguzUnxiS9k+b0XniHZTmYhxK97iG 8wLyWuFXrOEt4S8Co4MjBNCiCkghUaQcz8U7cVwup1SRMebMLA5epJrfUckVbLb0 5GXpebQKTqQ= =OC7x -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-FnefB5NCjdnGZpJcX5zC-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/