Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 18:38:37 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 18:38:37 -0500 Received: from smtp-send.myrealbox.com ([192.108.102.143]:34462 "EHLO smtp-send.myrealbox.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 18:38:37 -0500 Message-ID: <3E52C652.7030109@hotmail.com> Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 15:48:34 -0800 From: walt Organization: none User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030210 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Linux v2.5.62 --- spontaneous reboots References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1086 Lines: 25 Chris Wedgwood wrote: > ...I'd suspect it was an Athlon or chipset problem if it weren't for the > fact 2.4.x is stable for 8+ hours doing doing the same exact thing[1]. Unfortunately this is not proof :-( I can tell you from personal experience that the BSD kernels are much more sensitive to overheating hardware than linux is, for example -- so one linux kernel could just as easily be more sensitive to overheating than another linux kernel. I've never found out why this is, but I know it's true. When I try to run a BSD kernel on a dust-covered motherboard I'll get random crashes all over the place even though a linux kernel will run just fine on the same machine. All I do is blow the dust off the motherboard and both kernels run again without problem. Absolutely for sure. I'd love to know what makes the difference. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/