Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753616AbbHLO1q (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:27:46 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com ([209.85.212.175]:36030 "EHLO mail-wi0-f175.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752920AbbHLO1o (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Aug 2015 10:27:44 -0400 Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 16:27:34 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: Andy Lutomirski , "ksummit-discuss@lists.linuxfoundation.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Paul McKenney , Christoph Lameter , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Juergen Gross , Jan Beulich , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Chris Metcalf , Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [Ksummit-discuss] [BELATED CORE TOPIC] context tracking / nohz / RCU state Message-ID: <20150812142732.GD21542@lerouge> References: <20150811184258.GB30479@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150811184258.GB30479@wotan.suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2379 Lines: 55 On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 08:42:58PM +0200, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:49:36AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > > This is a bit late, but here goes anyway. > > > > Having played with the x86 context tracking hooks for awhile, I think > > it would be nice if core code that needs to be aware of CPU context > > (kernel, user, idle, guest, etc) could come up with single, > > comprehensible, easily validated set of hooks that arch code is > > supposed to call. > > > > Currently we have: > > > > - RCU hooks, which come in a wide variety to notify about IRQs, NMIs, etc. > > > > - Context tracking hooks. Only used by some arches. Calling these > > calls the RCU hooks for you in most cases. They have weird > > interactions with interrupts and they're slow. > > > > - vtime. Beats the heck out of me. > > > > - Whatever deferred things Christoph keeps reminding us about. > > > > Honestly, I don't fully understand what all these hooks are supposed > > to do, nor do I care all that much. From my perspective, the code > > code should be able to do whatever it wants and rely on appropriate > > notifications from arch code. It would be great if we could come up > > with something straightforward that covers everything. For example: > > > > user_mode_to_kernel_mode() > > kernel_mode_to_user_mode() > > kernel_mode_to_guest_mode() > > in_a_periodic_tick() > > starting_nmi() > > ending_nmi() > > may_i_turn_off_ticks_right_now() > > or, better yet: > > i_am_turning_off_ticks_right_now_and_register_your_own_darned_hrtimer_if_thats_a_problem() > > > > Some arches may need: > > > > i_am_lame_and_forgot_my_previous_context() > > Can all this information be generalized with some basic core hooks > or could some of this contextual informatioin typically vary depending > on the sequence we are in ? It sounds like its the later and that's > the issue ? That's what we do with context tracking. It tracks the context (user/kernel) and stores these informations. And indeed the contextual informations can vary depending for example if an exception triggered in userspace or kernelspace. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/