Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 22:33:58 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 22:33:57 -0500 Received: from are.twiddle.net ([64.81.246.98]:12186 "EHLO are.twiddle.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 22:33:57 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 19:43:51 -0800 From: Richard Henderson To: Linus Torvalds Cc: rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] eliminate warnings in generated module files Message-ID: <20030218194351.A23525@twiddle.net> Mail-Followup-To: Linus Torvalds , rusty@rustcorp.com.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030218184317.A20436@twiddle.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from torvalds@transmeta.com on Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 07:29:15PM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 829 Lines: 29 On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 07:29:15PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Have you tested this with older compilers? Nope. > In particular, I have this dim memory of gcc historically not liking > multiple separate __attribute__ bits, ie > > __attribute__((unused,__section__ ...)) > > would be fine, but > > __attribute__((unused)) __attribute__((__section__ ...)) > > would not compile. > > But hey, my brain is cabbage, and my memory might be crap. Hmm. It was always supposed to have worked, but I suppose there could have been bugs. How far back to I need to go looking? r~ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/