Message-ID: <1439405812.4023.530.camel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] VFIO: platform: add irq bypass producer
 management
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
Cc: eric.auger@st.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
        kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        christoffer.dall@linaro.org, marc.zyngier@arm.com, feng.wu@intel.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@linaro.org, pbonzini@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 12:56:52 -0600
In-Reply-To: <1439212864-12954-7-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org>
References: <1439212864-12954-1-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org>
	 <1439212864-12954-7-git-send-email-eric.auger@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 2914
Lines: 87

On Mon, 2015-08-10 at 15:21 +0200, Eric Auger wrote:
> This patch populates the IRQ bypass callacks:
> - stop/start producer simply consist in disabling/enabling the host irq
> - add/del consumer: basically set the automasked flag to false/true
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@linaro.org>
> 
> ---
> v2 -> v3:
> - vfio_platform_irq_bypass_add_consumer now returns an error in case
>   the IRQ is recognized as active
> - active boolean not set anymore
> - do not VFIO mask the IRQ anymore on unforward
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> - device handle caching in vfio_platform_device is introduced in a
>   separate patch
> - use container_of
> ---
>  drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c
> index efaee58..400a188 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/platform/vfio_platform_irq.c
> @@ -224,23 +224,44 @@ static int vfio_platform_is_active(struct vfio_platform_irq *irq)
>  
>  static void vfio_platform_irq_bypass_stop(struct irq_bypass_producer *prod)
>  {
> +	disable_irq(prod->irq);
>  }
>  
>  static void vfio_platform_irq_bypass_start(struct irq_bypass_producer *prod)
>  {
> +	enable_irq(prod->irq);
>  }
>  
>  static int vfio_platform_irq_bypass_add_consumer(
>  			struct irq_bypass_producer *prod,
>  			struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons)
>  {
> -	return 0;
> +	struct vfio_platform_irq *irq =
> +		container_of(prod, struct vfio_platform_irq, producer);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * if the IRQ is active at irqchip level or VFIO (auto)masked
> +	 * this means the host IRQ is already under injection in the
> +	 * guest and this not safe to change the forwarding state at
> +	 * that stage.
> +	 * It is not possible to differentiate user-space masking
> +	 * from auto-masking, leading to possible false detection of
> +	 * active state.
> +	 */
> +	if (vfio_platform_is_active(irq))
> +		return -EAGAIN;

Here's an example of why we don't want WARN_ON if a registration fails,
this is effectively random.  When and how is a re-try going to happen?

> +
> +	return vfio_platform_set_automasked(irq, false);

set_forwarded just seems so much more logical here.

>  }
>  
>  static void vfio_platform_irq_bypass_del_consumer(
>  			struct irq_bypass_producer *prod,
>  			struct irq_bypass_consumer *cons)
>  {
> +	struct vfio_platform_irq *irq =
> +		container_of(prod, struct vfio_platform_irq, producer);
> +
> +	vfio_platform_set_automasked(irq, true);
>  }
>  
>  static int vfio_set_trigger(struct vfio_platform_device *vdev, int index,


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/