Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 22:59:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 22:59:07 -0500 Received: from pizda.ninka.net ([216.101.162.242]:8381 "EHLO pizda.ninka.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 18 Feb 2003 22:59:07 -0500 Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 19:52:05 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20030218.195205.85404023.davem@redhat.com> To: neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Subject: Re: sendmsg and IP_PKTINFO From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <15954.4693.893707.471216@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> References: <15949.40369.601166.550803@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> <1045552237.4501.8.camel@rth.ninka.net> <15954.4693.893707.471216@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> X-FalunGong: Information control. X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 852 Lines: 19 From: Neil Brown Date: Tue, 18 Feb 2003 22:00:37 +1100 It does go on to say that the outgoing packet will be sent over the same interface, however I feel that is an illogical conclusion given the description of the meaning of the field. So yes, the current behaviour seems to match part of the documentation. However I argue that the documented behaviour is irrational. Alexey and myself totally disagree. We have described for you the intended purpose of this feature. Please do not try to use it in some other way, it may prove to be painful :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/